I railed against Citizens United vs. FEC last week, and so has most of the liberal side of American politics. The only exception is Glenn Greenwald, a writer I respect. (Part 1, Part 2, Questions 1, Questions 2).
I don't agree with his assessment especially in his Questions section, largely because I think a contribution from Wal-Mart or Planned Parenthood is far different than an individual contribution. Both organizations aren't full of employees who agree on every issue or candidate. A contribution from an organization will reflect the views of its leadership, and leadership already enjoys a significant voice in American politics. Why should it increase?
What happens when a foreign or multi-national organization enters the fray?
I doubt that any of these bills will make it out of committee, but Alan Grayson (D- Fla) certainly has a good sense of humor balanced with a sense of justice.
Monday, January 25, 2010
"I think few people would say that what we really need in America is more corporate interference in the political process." -Alan Grayson
Labels:
Alan Grayson,
Free Speech,
Glenn Greenwald,
Supreme Court
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment